Jensen, T. M., Metz, A. J., Disbennett, M. E., Afkinich, J. L., & Farley, A. B. (2026). Evaluation of a university-based certificate program designed to bolster the workforce of implementation support practitioners. Implementation Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895261456681
There is a dearth of studies on implementation science capacity-building programs for nonresearchers. Specifically, recent reviews point to the lack of capacity-building and training programs for professionals who support service providers to implement evidence-based programs, practice, and policies. This study assesses the acceptability and effectiveness of a university-based certificate program in implementation practice for professionals who provide implementation support. The results are promising, with program participants showcasing notable and sustained gains in implementation-related knowledge, skills, motivation, capability, and opportunity. This study addresses both a gap in the literature and the growing divide between implementation research and practice.
Method: The certificate program consisted of three 2-day courses, each grounded in 15 core competencies linked to skillful implementation support and delivered using an online synchronous approach to three cohorts of participants between February 2023 and May 2024. Enrollment for each cohort was limited to ensure personalized interaction between program faculty and participants, with cohort sizes ranging from 36 to 47. Leveraging a mixed-methods approach, we collected and analyzed both quantitative and qualitative evaluation data to evaluate the certificate program.
Results: A large majority of participants from all three cohorts agreed that they were satisfied with program and experienced gains in knowledge, skills, and perceived capability, motivation, and opportunity to apply their learnings. Participants also yielded significant gains from pre- to post-program across all 15 targeted competencies. Qualitative analyses indicated that participants appreciated the program’s high-qualty faculty, skilled facilitation, respectful learning environment, and practical curriculum. The synchronous format and consistent small-group work also were valued. Suggested program improvement included more small-group time and clearer links between readings and speaker content. Follow-up surveys indicated sustained impacts and content application in participants’ day-to-day work activities.